How to measure adipose tissue insulin sensitivity

E Søndergaard, AE Espinosa De Ycaza… - The Journal of …, 2017 - academic.oup.com
E Søndergaard, AE Espinosa De Ycaza, M Morgan-Bathke, MD Jensen
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2017academic.oup.com
Abstract Context and Objective: Adipose tissue insulin resistance may cause hepatic and
skeletal muscle insulin resistance by releasing excess free fatty acids (FFAs). Because no
consensus exists on how to quantify adipose tissue insulin sensitivity we compared three
methods for measuring adipose tissue insulin sensitivity: the single step insulin clamp, the
multistep pancreatic clamp, and the adipose tissue insulin resistance index (Adipo-IR).
Design and Participants: We studied insulin sensitivity in 25 adults by measuring the insulin …
Context and Objective
Adipose tissue insulin resistance may cause hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin resistance by releasing excess free fatty acids (FFAs). Because no consensus exists on how to quantify adipose tissue insulin sensitivity we compared three methods for measuring adipose tissue insulin sensitivity: the single step insulin clamp, the multistep pancreatic clamp, and the adipose tissue insulin resistance index (Adipo-IR).
Design and Participants
We studied insulin sensitivity in 25 adults by measuring the insulin concentration resulting in 50% suppression of palmitate flux (IC50) using both a multistep pancreatic clamp and a one-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Palmitate kinetics were measured using a continuous infusion of [U-13C]palmitate. Adipo-IR was calculated from fasting insulin and fasting FFA concentrations.
Results
Adipo-IR was reproducible (sample coefficient of variability, 10.0%) and correlated with the IC50 measured by the multistep pancreatic clamp technique (r, 0.86; P < 0.001). Age and physical fitness were significant predictors of the residual variation between Adipo-IR and IC50, with a positive relationship with age (r, 0.47; P = 0.02) and a negative association with VO2 peak (r, −0.46; P = 0.02). Likewise, IC50 measured by the multistep pancreatic clamp technique correlated with IC50 measured using the one-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique (r, 0.73; P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Adipo-IR and the one-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique using a palmitate tracer are good predictors of a gold standard measure of adipose tissue insulin sensitivity. However, age and physical fitness systematically affect the predictive values. Although Adipo-IR is suitable for larger population studies, the multistep pancreatic clamp technique is probably needed for mechanistic studies of adipose tissue insulin action.
Oxford University Press